Update on 2/28/17
More great research news: Better support needed for academic success!
Now I need to correct myself - why am I talking about ELLs when the reality is about DLLs?
Dual Language Learning is much more appropriate way to discuss bi- and multilingualism!
Too often assessments and evaluations focus on students' language
skills instead algebraic understanding, problem solving, or critical thinking
(e.g. math story problems, science performance assessments, or SAT). Such
assessments and evaluations do not support students' learning.
My main takeaway
from the article was the dilemma of reclassification, and whether it is done
too soon or too early. When does an ELL student stop being one?
The conclusion of the article was also scary. There is a possibility of reclassification "focusing on demonstrating compliance as opposed to truly expanding educational opportunity." Compliance to the policy should be secondary to students' needs, if we want students to learn, not just perform.
The conclusion of the article was also scary. There is a possibility of reclassification "focusing on demonstrating compliance as opposed to truly expanding educational opportunity." Compliance to the policy should be secondary to students' needs, if we want students to learn, not just perform.
Of course, I bring
my own bias into this discussion: after living in the States for several years,
I don't feel perfectly fluent in English, and probably never will. The
punctuation rules and prepositions are still causing gray hair to me! My L1,
Finnish, has no prepositions (however, we have lots of postpositions).
My youngest
daughter was 13 when we moved to the States. She never qualified to the ELL
program, but tested right out of it. Her own definition was that she wrote well
but did not speak enough, and also had excellent grammar from studying English
at school since 3rd grade before moving here. My son learned his English after
we moved here, so he qualified for ELL program for two years, starting on 2nd
grade. Today they both speak and write better English than I do.
But if 1 student
out of 10 is still learning English, we really should emphasize the
instructional practices that support language awareness. Realistically, in 21st
century bilinguals (or multilinguals) are the majority. There seems to be a
consensus about more than 50% people speaking more than just one language. This page suggests only 40% of world's
population being monolinguals.
I addition to increasing
educator's awareness of the ELL policy, there should be strong emphasis in
supporting students' learning - and language learning - regardless of their
home language. There is plenty of research showing how emphasizing the
importance of home language supports learning English. Language awareness is
what matters. Yes, the vocabulary and grammar are different, but languages of
the same group are quite alike. Hence, a language like Interlingua is understandable to many. Even
if the home language doesn't belong to the same language family, the awareness
of how a language works is an important step in becoming bilingual or
multilingual.
So, how to fairly
assess what a multilingual student knows or has learned? Informal assessments,
observations, and visual projects are better for avoiding misunderstanding. And
if you just have to use a worksheet or test? For starters, please, don't use
idioms and phrasal verbs. Keep the language simple. Provide more time. Then
again - aren't these the best assessment and evaluation practice for all
students?